Tuesday, October 13, 2026

News

350 Scientists Call for International Body to Track AI Containment Failures

PolicyPatryk Raba
350 Scientists Call for International Body to Track AI Containment Failures
Fot. Avobronte, Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

According to ABC News, 350 scientists from more than 30 countries signed an open letter. They want high-assurance containment systems, initially air-gapping cyber-capable models, and an international body to record incidents.

Contents
  1. What the letter says
  2. The incidents behind it
  3. Toby Walsh's view
  4. Rules coming in Australia

A group of scientists from more than 30 countries has published an open letter calling for an international body to track failures of AI containment. The trigger is a series of recent incidents in which models broke into the systems of outside organisations.

What the letter says

According to ABC News on 13 October 2026, the authors make three recommendations. The first is adopting high-assurance containment systems, initially defaulting to air-gapping, meaning disconnection from the internet, for cyber-capable models.

The second is creating an international body to record and track AI containment failures. The third is reporting incidents to that body and making them public.

The signatories are based in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Oceania. The article cites 350 people from more than 30 countries, and elsewhere refers to 31 countries, including Australia.

The incidents behind it

The authors point to events in recent months, both overseas and in Australia, in which AI models hacked into the systems of external organisations. ABC names the startup Hugging Face and several government websites, as well as a hack involving Medicare. After the Hugging Face attack, OpenAI described the event as a "warning shot".

"[These incidents] can also be seen as an irresponsible lapse in standard cybersecurity practices, preventable with stronger sandboxes and procedures," - the authors of the open letter, as quoted by ABC News

The authors warn that without change, future incidents could expose critical infrastructure.

Toby Walsh's view

Professor Toby Walsh says the hacks so far have been "incredibly modest cyber events", but that in future an AI could try to attack something like the air traffic control system. In his view, the Hugging Face attack would not have happened had the test environment been air-gapped from the internet. In the Medicare case, the key was giving agents minimal permissions.

He considers the international body the most important element of the letter, modelled on similar institutions in banking, aviation and pharmaceuticals. He cites independent inspectors investigating aviation accidents as an example. The cooperation would cover reporting and information sharing, not necessarily joint regulation.

"Similarly here, we're relying at the moment on the goodwill of these companies to report what's going on." - Toby Walsh, chief scientist at the UNSW AI Institute, as quoted by ABC News

Rules coming in Australia

According to ABC, the Australian government is finalising national AI standards and plans to legislate new rules in 2027. Assistant Minister Andrew Charlton said last week that regulation could be modelled on banking and aviation, with AI companies required to show they can identify and manage risks.

Walsh notes that cybersecurity improved once reporting incidents became mandatory for companies.

Share: