Saturday, August 29, 2026

News

Bill Gates: AI Will Permanently Eliminate Jobs, Calls for a Robot Tax

MarketPatryk Raba

In an annual essay published August 26, Bill Gates warns that AI will permanently eliminate some office and physical jobs, and calls on governments to introduce a robot tax and positions reserved exclusively for humans.

Contents
  1. What Gates wrote
  2. Jobs reserved for humans only
  3. A robot tax and a skewed system
  4. Crime and children
  5. What it means for Poland

Bill Gates has published a roughly six-thousand-word essay in which, for the first time, he speaks this bluntly about the permanent loss of jobs driven by the growth of artificial intelligence. The Microsoft co-founder argues that governments around the world are not prepared for the pace at which AI is transforming the labor market, and he proposes concrete tax and legal tools to limit the effects of automation.

What Gates wrote

In the essay, framed as Gates's annual letter, the billionaire admits he is himself surprised by the pace at which AI technology is advancing, and argues the world is entering an era without sufficient institutional safeguards. He is not describing hypothetical, distant scenarios, Gates writes about changes he believes will happen within this decade.

The jobs most exposed to automation are said to be office roles built around processing information: customer service, part of software engineering work, and paralegal work at law firms. At the same time, Gates argues, physical sectors such as construction and hospitality will move toward robotization too, though at a somewhat slower pace than white-collar work.

Jobs reserved for humans only

The essay's central proposal is the concept of "human reserved jobs", positions that remain reserved for people by design, even where automating them would be technologically possible. Gates explains the idea through a comparison to nature reserves.

I like the term human reserved because it evokes nature reserves, places where we could put up buildings and roads but consciously choose not to - Bill Gates

As examples of areas where automation would be technically feasible but socially undesirable, Gates points to healthcare and education. In the essay he asks directly whether anyone would want to hear a diagnosis of a terminal illness from a robot, and stresses that some human relationships, such as teaching or caring for a patient, should remain the domain of people regardless of what the technology can do.

A robot tax and a skewed system

Gates criticizes the current tax system, which he says rewards replacing workers with machines. Employers pay taxes on wages but can write off the costs of automation investments, creating an asymmetry that encourages cutting jobs.

The tax system pushes you toward replacing people with machines - Bill Gates

As a remedy, he proposes introducing a robot tax along with a fee calculated on "tokens", the units of data processed by AI systems. Revenue from such taxes would fund worker retraining and social safety nets for people whose jobs disappear.

Crime and children

Beyond the labor market, Gates describes two additional risks. The first is the empowerment of criminals with low technical skills, who gain access through AI to tools for fraud, disinformation, and large-scale attacks. The second concerns children and teenagers, Gates worries that AI companions, which never push users outside their comfort zone, may disrupt young people's social development and replace genuine human relationships.

Gates also points to Generation Z, which is entering the job market just as the number of openings for entry-level positions is already shrinking. In his view, it is the youngest workers who will bear the greatest cost of this transitional period, before economies manage to adapt their regulations to the new reality.

What it means for Poland

Gates's voice adds to an ongoing discussion in Poland about the future of the labor market in the age of AI, from research showing that office jobs are most exposed to changes in job scope, to debate over whether companies are genuinely cutting jobs because of AI or merely citing it to justify standard cost cuts. The robot tax proposal, though so far absent from legislative debate in Poland, fits into a broader question governments across the European Union are asking themselves: who should fund the retraining of workers displaced by automation.

Gates's essay is not a legal document or an announcement of specific policy, it is the voice of an influential technology commentator who has previously warned publicly about pandemics and climate change. His recommendations carry no binding force, but given the author's standing they could influence regulatory debate in the US and Europe, especially amid growing pressure to put legal frameworks for AI in place before, as Gates puts it, unemployment rises sharply.

Share: